beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant A and C made a false statement to the victim D on December 8, 2017, stating that “I would pay the whole of the cost of equipment and the cost of using the cell phone in the name of the cell phone, without any delay, by opening the cell phone in the name of the cell phone.”
However, the Defendant and C received a mobile phone opening in the name of the victim at the time of the instant case, and separated the core chips, sold the machine to the victim without the name of the victim and disposed of the machine, and used the separated core chips to make a small payment using the separated core chips. As such, even if the mobile phone opening in the victim’s name had no regular income or special property at the time of the instant case, there was no intention or ability to pay the cost of the mobile phone and the fee for the use thereof.
The Defendant and C, as above, deceiving the victim and caused the victim to open a cell phone (G) in the name of the victim at the F mobile communication company located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, the same day, and obtained it by delivery, and subsequently acquired a total of 310,760 won by paying a small sum of 310,760 won using the chip of the above mobile phone, and then acquired the pecuniary profit equivalent to the same amount from around that time to December 23, 2017, and acquired the victim a total of 14,679,178 won in total nine times, as shown in the list of crimes, from that time.
"2018 Highest 2137"
1. On November 2017, 2017, the Defendant against the victim B posted a letter stating that he/she would sell 1 set up in the mobile app “S H” to 4.80,000 won, to the victim who reported and contacted with the Defendant, the Defendant would sell the said box box to the victim who reported it.
A false statement was made.
However, the defendant is not the owner of the above crowdfunding store, and even if he receives the transfer of the sales proceeds from the injured party, he will send the above crowdfunding.