logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.08.19 2014고정1120
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 26, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) without obtaining a driver’s license, driving a motorcycle that has no number plate on the road from the 34-114th day of Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul to the front day of the river of Taewonwon-dong, Yongsan-gu, Seoul.

2. Although the Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle with the knowledge that the structure of the motor vehicle has been changed without obtaining the approval of the mayor, etc., the Defendant arbitrarily operated the motor vehicle with its structure changed by attaching the headlight with the HID light at the same time and place as the foregoing paragraph

3. The Defendant, while operating an automobile with no driver’s license as above, arbitrarily changed its structure while driving the automobile with no driver’s license, was punished by police officers B belonging to the Yongsan Police Station, and the remainder of the two balls, which were the shape C, were used to prepare a self-written statement using his name and resident registration number.

On June 26, 2013, the Defendant has violated the automobile structure system by using a tample in the name column C, resident registration number C, and Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu, the detection place, and driving without registration at the office of traffic safety guidance of the Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, using a tample in the self-written form.

After stating the above-mentioned C, the signature was signed next to the name of C.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, the Defendant forged a letter of self-statement C, a private document related to the certification of fact.

4. The Defendant, at the same time and place as above 3, issued to police officers B, who knew of the forgery, a false statement of forgery as above, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Self-written, on-site photographs;

1. The register of driver's licenses;

arrow