logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.08.31 2016고정2375
사회복지사업법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

An incorporated association B (hereinafter “instant incorporated association”) is a corporation established for the protection of women’s family members and C, which is operated with subsidies from the viewing of Busan, and the Defendant served as the head of F facility located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan, from September 13, 2014 to December 31, 2014.

1. The Defendant, in violation of the Social Welfare Business Act, used subsidies granted by the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family and the Busan City Mayor with respect to the F operation of the facility to which the incorporated association of this case belongs for purposes other than the following three times.

A. On December 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around December 24, 2014, performed self-support programs (cailization training) for inmates; (b) did not show a vehicle siren to move the inmates; (c) did not account as if he paid the vehicle support expense, and used the vehicle 200,000 won as personnel expenses for the employees engaged in the restter.

B. On December 24, 2014, the Defendant spent each of the subsidies granted from F to F with the F’s budget of strengthening F’s function as the construction cost for electrical facilities of the instant incorporated association, which were located on the third floor of the building in which F had moved into the said third floor, as KRW 1,50,000, and the construction cost for fire-fighting systems, as the construction cost for fire-fighting systems.

(c)

On December 12, 2014, the Defendant spent KRW 257.80,00 from F’s operating expenses, acquisition tax imposed on G, the representative of the instant incorporated association, for extension of the building occupied by F.

2. The defendant 1 does not use the subsidy for any other purpose despite the fact that the subsidized project operator who is subject to the grant of the subsidy in violation of the Subsidy Management Act has not been granted the subsidy.

(a).

The subsidy was used for other purposes twice as described in the paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H and G;

1. Each written confirmation by I and J;

1. Details of investigation instruction to refer cases to civil rights committees and further verification and investigation;

1. Details ofF support, cash receipt and disbursement books, related data, and a certificate of authorization to protective facilities;

1. A report on internal investigation, an investigation report;

arrow