Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 5, 2016, the Defendant driving a body car as C around 05:10, and driving a body car as its duty at the speed of about 40km in the direction of the west-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, the Defendant proceeds from the dialogue of the three-lane road at a speed of about 40km in the direction of the earth zone.

At the time, she was under the care of the driver, so in such a case, the driver engaged in the driving of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to care in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle in accordance with traffic signals and to prevent the accident.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and caused the part on the left left left side of the Defendant’s front-hand part of the bicycle rear-wheeled by the victim D(75 tax) who was directly driven from the right side of the passenger car driving direction to the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle to go over the ground by the direct negligence in violation of the stop signal.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injuries such as salted tensions and tensions that need to be treated for about six weeks, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking measures, such as providing relief to the injured party.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident investigation report and an investigation report (Evidence No. 9);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. The decision of fine is made in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 5-3(1)2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the escape after occupational injury and injury), the decision of fine [the fact that the defendant's mistake appears, the vehicle in this case appears to have been covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and the victim and the victim have agreed to have a separate agreement, and there was no criminal punishment until 202, in addition to the fact that the vehicle in this case was sentenced to a fine twice by a fine by not later than 202.