Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On July 28, 2012, at around 00:33, the Defendants: (a) cut off a enormous wind line for public relations of business places equivalent to KRW 250,000,000, the market price of the victim owned by the victim D in the “Ep” front of the “Ep” parking lot operated by the victim D, which was operated by the Defendant A; and (b) cut off the vehicle of Fland C’s car, and then loaded it into the between the Defendants.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Reports on occurrence of theft and CCTV photographs;

1. Application of seizure records and photographs of seized articles to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants subject to discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do148, Apr. 1, 201)

1. Defendants subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act);