A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) on April 10, 2016, at the convenience store located at 01:52, around 01:52, the victim D, who works in that place, without any reason, shall do so; (b) whether the inside bitch bitch bitch bitch, inside 200,

R. L. L. L.C.;

60 20 20 20 20

The term “Ireh, Ire to the Fresh women, Ire to the Fresh of Fresh, Ire to the Fresh of Fresh;

People working in the drinking house have obstructed the victim's convenience store business by force for about 8 minutes by avoiding disturbance, such as intending to see by sound and hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on the occurrence of cases, inspection, and investigation (to attach CCTV images installed inside a convenience store);

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act in relation to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment for one month to five years; and

2. Where the scope of the recommended punishment [the scope of the recommended punishment] according to the sentencing criteria is limited to the scope of the recommended punishment [the scope of the recommended punishment], the scope of the special mitigation area (one month to eight months), or the degree of the threat of force or deceptive scheme, or the degree of interference with business, is insignificant, the penalty is not imposed (including efforts that have been advanced for the recovery of damage).

3. Determination of sentence: Determination of sentence by comprehensively taking account of the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the commission of the crime;

The crime of this case was committed during the suspension of execution and protection observation even though the court was sentenced to an order to observe other crimes for the suspension of execution and protection observation, and the crime of this case was committed only two months after being sentenced to a fine on February 2, 2016 during the period of the suspension of execution and protection observation, and even after being sentenced to a fine on around February 2016, which was under the suspension of execution, and the crime of this case was committed only two months after being sentenced to the crime of bodily injury, the confession that there was a history of punishment for the same crime, the degree of interference with business is not much severe, and