The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting Defendant A of all of the charges on the ground that: (a) there was no proof of a crime as to the offering of a bribe and the offering of a bribe within the scope of KRW 19.2 million to KRW 72.8 million among the charges of the instant case’s violation of the Act on the Bribery of Bribery and the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) by Defendant B; and (b) there was no evidence of a crime as to the violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act by Defendant A of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, which did not constitute a crime as to the

The judgment below

In light of the records, the above determination by the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, it did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) and blanket crimes.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.