1. The part concerning the claim for reinstatement among the instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) the annexed list;

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. The purport of the claim in a civil suit of dismissed parts must be specified in detail so that the contents and scope of the claim can be clearly identified in the complaint for the purpose of specifying the subject matter of the lawsuit and the scope of the trial of the court.

A lawsuit for which the purport of a claim is not clearly specified shall not be exempted from dismissal because it is unlawful, and the court shall ex officio examine whether the purport of the claim is specified.

Among the lawsuits of this case, the part claiming restitution is unlawful because the entries of the purport of the claim alone do not clearly confirm the specific contents, such as the meaning, point or condition that serves as the basis for reinstatement, and the structure and area of the object seeking restitution.

Therefore, this part of the claim is dismissed.