A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 4. 10. 23:10 경 대전 서구 대덕대로 333번 길에 있는 만년 동 성당 앞에서, 소나타 승용차를 운전하여 대전정부종합청사 앞에 있던 입간판 등 기물을 부순 후 도주하다가 위 C 소속 경위 D에 의해 붙잡혔고, D으로부터 신분증 제시를 요구 받자 피고인의 차량에 타고 있던 지인들과 행인 수명이 듣고 있는 가운데 D에게 “ 똥냄새 나는 주둥아리 닥쳐. 이 새끼야. 왜 나를 잡는 거냐.

Crane . Amama 204, hereinafter referred to as the “Choe . Ga Ri”, and assaulted D’s back head on the floor of the lue Damage in several times.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the suppression and investigation of crimes, and publicly insultingd the victim D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Although there is not good reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution and the circumstances leading to the commission of a crime, there is no record of a crime exceeding the same criminal history and fine, considering the favorable circumstances in which police officers did not have any injury, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended in consideration of the conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act.