The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are favorable to the Defendant, such as the confession and reflection of the instant crime, and the victim is not punished by the Defendant.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime by deceiving 15 million won by deceiving the victim as if he/she was a public official of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs and was well aware of the Ministry of Environment, and as if he/she would obtain the performance approval of the food treatment equipment for which a patent application was filed by the victim. In light of the background and contents leading up to the instant crime, and the method of committing the crime, etc., the nature of the crime is very poor, and the Defendant may already have the record of criminal punishment, including punishment, due to the same kind of crime. In particular, the Defendant was released from the Incheon District Court on November 4, 201 after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one and a half years, and repeated the instant crime during the repeated crime period, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, happy family environment, and conditions before and after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.