beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition are either in dispute between the parties or in accordance with Gap evidence 1-1-4, evidence 2-1, evidence 2-2, evidence 3-1, 2-3, evidence 4-1 to 4, and the whole purport of the pleadings. A.
On August 23, 1997, the Defendant obtained a loan under the name of card loan loan loan loan (limit) from the Dongnam Bank Co., Ltd. and the due date of repayment on August 23, 1998. On August 24, 1998, the due date of repayment was extended to September 29, 1998 between the Korea Housing and Commercial Bank and the Korea Housing and Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. which has taken over a loan contract from Dongnam Bank. 2) on March 31, 1999, the Korea Housing and Commercial Bank transferred the above loan claim against the Defendant to the Plaintiff on May 26, 1999, and notified the Defendant of the above fact of transfer on or around May 26, 199.
3) On July 29, 2003, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit with the Seoul District Court (2003Gaso2061137) seeking a loan against the Defendant, and decided on November 4, 2003, “the Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff 20,084,536 won and 11,386,49 won among them at the rate of 18% per annum from June 24, 2003 to the date of full payment,” and the above decision became final and conclusive around that time. (b) The Defendant was in arrears with the credit card payment liability from December 23, 1998 while entering into a credit card exchange agreement with the Japanese Bank on June 197.
2) On July 9, 1999, Japan Bank transferred to the Plaintiff the above credit card user claim against the Defendant, and around July 21, 1999, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the above credit card user claim. 3) On November 8, 2003, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant on the north Branch of Seoul District Court (2003 Ghana 199141), claiming the above credit card user fee against the Defendant. On November 12, 2003, the same court held that the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff KRW 2,966,782 and KRW 1,33,328 from October 15, 2003.