logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.11.10 2015가단9379
손해배상(의)
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 21,764,738, and KRW 5,00,00 among them, the Defendant shall start from August 1, 2013, and the remainder 16,764.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 23, 2013, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “a conical signboard disability in which standing is unknown” and “a conical signboard disability in which standing is unknown” at the D Hospital located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon, and was subject to the climatic mological surgery on July 23, 2013 (hereinafter “instant procedure”). On July 27, 2013, the Plaintiff was subject to the climatic malmological surgery (hereinafter “instant procedure”).

The defendant performed the instant procedure with his intention to work at the above hospital.

B. The Plaintiff was treated in a middle-patient room after receiving emergency measures due to the congestion of food after the instant treatment, the difficulty in respiratory and sculling, etc. (hereinafter “the symptoms of this case”).

C. The instant treatment is a treatment method to alleviate pains by inserting a special camera under the open name of the bones, thereby reaching the part of the vertebroscopum catum catum inverte, and then administering drugs (a drug combining national anesthesias, skin cata, stepha, stephoids, and ephoids, which are a sanction for food infections).

In doing the instant procedure, the carter and tent strings shall be accurately located in the outer space so as not to damage the light, and for this purpose, the radiation strings must be able to see the radiation string devices, and when the light strings are well located in the outer space of the light, the drugs should be administered.

The Plaintiff still remains symptoms of both arms, sacrife, sacrife, and sacrife after head (hereinafter referred to as “instant disability”) due to the impact of the damage of the number of arms that occurred during the instant procedure.

[Grounds for recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Gap evidence Nos. 10 through 13, Gap evidence No. 23, Gap evidence No. 27 (including numbers), the result of the commission of the medical record appraisal to the director of medical school at the school of the next generation of this court (hereinafter "the result of the commission of the medical record appraisal in this case"), and the result of the commission of the physical examination to the director of the astronomical mother hospital at the same time.

arrow