1. The defendant is against the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party C:

A. 68.20 square meters underground among the buildings listed in the attached list.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff (appointed party) and the selected party C (hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff, etc.") concluded a lease agreement with the defendant on November 30, 2015 with respect to the 68.20 square meters (hereinafter referred to as "the building of this case") on the 1/2 share among the buildings listed in the separate sheet, and with the defendant on November 30, 2015, with respect to the 70,000 square meters of the branch floor (hereinafter referred to as "the building of this case"), without a lease deposit, from November 30, 2015 to November 29, 2017. According to the fact that the defendant did not pay the rent from June 2016 to June 6, 2017, the plaintiff, etc. lawfully delivered the lease agreement to the defendant on the ground that the lease contract of this case was terminated by mail delivery.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant building to the Plaintiff, etc., and to pay the amount calculated by applying the rate of KRW 700,000 per month from April 30, 2017 to March 2017 to the overdue rent of KRW 7 million, and the amount calculated by applying the rate of KRW 700,000 per month from April 30, 2017 to the completion date of delivery of the building.

2. If so, the claim of this case by the plaintiff et al. is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.