A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[2012 Highest 1789] On July 15, 2012, the Defendant ordered drinking and drinking to the victim at the “E” ran tavern operated by the victim D with the victim D in the second floor in Guri-si, Gyeonggi-do, Seoul, and the victim.

However, in fact, there was no intention or ability to pay the drinking value to the victim because there was no money in water and there was no credit card.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, was provided with the victim with an alcoholic beverage and an alcoholic beverage equivalent to a total of 180,000 won from the market price.

【2012 Godan221】 The Defendant ordered the victim to alcohol and alcohol in the “H entertainment tavern” operated by the victim G located in Guri-si in Gyeonggi-do from around 22:00 on July 26, 2012 to around 01:00 on July 27, 2012.

However, there was no money in the number of the defendants, and even if they drink in the room with the entertainment loan, there was no intention or ability to pay the price or service fee.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, provided the victim with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 80,00 in the market price of KRW 80,00,00, and did not pay the sum of KRW 150,000,00, including the 80,000 and 60,000,000 and 150,000,000,000,000,000 for 2 hours.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, received property and acquired pecuniary benefits.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Application of D’s written statements and G’s written statements to statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes. Article 347 (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the sentencing reasons under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act include, among concurrent crimes, a number of criminal records of a same kind of fine, not only five identical criminal records, but also a number of criminal records of a same crime, and even after the completion of the execution of punishment around 207, with the same criminal records of a previous penal punishment as the instant crime.