logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.10 2016고단9029
교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for a period of one and half years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a bridge vehicle at Crypting Center.

On November 29, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 08:10, and driven the front sidewalk of the apartment at 571, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul, the Defendant driven the front sidewalk at a speed of about 5 to 10km in the direction of the brick gate in the direction of the intersection.

The driver of a vehicle shall pass along the roadway on the road where the sidewalk and the roadway are divided: Provided, That the driver of a vehicle may cross the sidewalk when entering a place other than the road, but shall temporarily stop immediately before crossing the sidewalk so as not to obstruct the passage of pedestrians, and shall not cross the road so as not to obstruct the normal passage of pedestrians, and if there is a concern over hampering the normal passage of pedestrians, the driver of the vehicle shall not pass behind the sidewalk. Therefore, the defendant at the time has a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of accidents by preventing the occurrence of accidents, such as checking whether there is a pedestrian who has installed an assistant on the rear side of the vehicle before crossing the sidewalk, and giving a warning.

Nevertheless, when the Defendant neglected to take any action without any reason, and viewed the opposite direction of the vehicle on the rear side of the mashed vehicle, the Defendant left the victim E (the victim E (the 35 years old) who was the mother of the said D (the 35 years old), which was fright back to the rear side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and led the victim E (the 35 years old) to go back with the left rear wheels of the Defendant’s vehicle.

The Defendant caused the victim D to die at the scene of the cardiopulmonary death due to the brain injury due to the foregoing occupational negligence and, at the same time, the victim E suffered injury, such as the front chests, proposing stuffs, and open wound of the fingers and the fingers, which require approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1.Each police officer for F and E.

arrow