logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.19 2016구합61496
관리처분계획변경인가처분취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 16, 2006, the Governor of the Gyeonggi-do publicly announced the Gyeonggi-do government as the Gyeonggi-do Housing Redevelopment Project Zone (hereinafter “E Housing Redevelopment Project Zone”). (b) The owners of land or buildings and superficies (hereinafter “owners of land, etc.”) within the instant project zone, including the plaintiffs, were the owners of the land or buildings and the persons holding superficies (hereinafter “owners of land, etc.”) under Article 26 of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (amended by Act No. 8785, Dec. 21, 2007; hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”), Article 37 of the Enforcement Decree of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (amended by Presidential Decree No. 21679, Aug. 11, 2009; hereinafter the same) and the resident representatives’ meeting was composed of 20 Dong-dong Housing Corporation (the Korea Housing Corporation and the Korea Land Corporation were merged with 20 Dong-dong Housing Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant 182”).

(A) The resident representatives’ meeting (hereinafter referred to as “A”, “B”, and the owners of land, etc. shall be referred to as “resident representatives’ meeting”, “B” and “residents”, respectively.

Article 2 (Project Implementation District and Promotion Method) (2) The project shall be implemented in accordance with the Management and Disposition Method that guarantees the substantial participation and rights and interests of residents in the implementation of the housing redevelopment project to the maximum extent possible.

arrow