1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the part pertaining to “3. conclusion”) except for correcting the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows 2. Thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation

2.The following shall be added to the right side of the “........” below the 3 pages of the modifications:

In addition, deeming that in order for the believers to be recognized as a refugee, it is unreasonable to view that they should reach the point of attention of the Chinese government due to active and leading activities related to E, which were conducted while staying in Korea, as a person who suffered persecution such as arrest or detention due to the relevant activities in China, is unreasonable since it unreasonably limits the requirements for refugee status. 4 pages below the 4th page, the following contents are added to the right side of the “five (Reference).” This requirement cannot be said to unreasonably restrict the requirements for refugee status by embodying the meaning of “sufficient-founded fear.”

A person shall be appointed.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims should be dismissed as all of the grounds for appeal.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.