Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years.
Defendant
A 92,000,000 won,
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2014 Highest 387]
1. The Defendants conspired with the Defendants on May 2009 to obtain permission to collect earth and stones from the office of Defendant A, which is located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and to transfer the same to the victims G. The Defendant A stated that “the public officials of the Tae-Gun Office in charge of the affairs related to the permission to collect earth and stones are well known.” The Defendant A provided that “the victims are well aware of the public officials of the Tae-Gun Office in charge of the affairs related to the permission to collect earth and stones.” The amount of KRW 150 million should be paid to the victims with the cost of the Guro-Gun Office in charge of the affairs related to the permission to collect earth and stones, and the amount of KRW 200 million should be changed to the cost of the success of the street,” and Defendant B stated that “the forest is managed in the agricultural and fishing village construction. The necessary work through the agricultural
However, in fact, ten lots, such as the Dasan-gun F, etc., were not allowed to collect earth and rocks from the beginning of the year, and there was no intention or ability to receive the earth and rocks in return for the solicitation of public officials.
The Defendants, as above, by deceiving the victims as above, received KRW 150 million from the victim for the purpose of permission to collect earth and stones from the J notarial office located in Seosan-si I on June 1, 2009.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim, acquire the property by deceiving the victim, and at the same time receive money and valuables of KRW 150 million under the pretext of soliciting the affairs handled by the public officials.
2. Defendant B’s sole criminal conduct
A. On May 2009, the Defendant, along with the victim G, returned home to the victim’s residence on a low scar in the middle of May 2009, after the Defendant met with the victim G, saying, “I know well the relevant public officials of the Thai-Gun Office in Thai-do. I would be able to obtain permission for collection of earth and stones promptly. I would like to change KRW 20 million from Rovi funds.”
However, in fact, 10 lots, such as the "F" of Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.