logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2012.09.14 2011고단2690
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 25, 201, at around 19:10 on June 19, 201, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) driving a 124c c c oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc oc, Seoul, Guro-gu, 19:50 on

2. On June 25, 201, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “Road Traffic Act”) and the Defendant driven the above Oral Sea in a state where normal driving is difficult due to a motor bicycle driver’s license without a motorcycle driver’s license on June 25, 201, while driving the above Oral Sea at the speed of about 50 km in speed from the right side of the erroneous road opening of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

At this point, there is an intersection where signal lights are installed on the front side, and in the same direction the victim B (the age 41) followed the CK5 car driven ahead of the same direction, so the driver of the motorcycle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as accurately operating the brake system, so as not to conflict when the above vehicle stops in accordance with the new subparagraph, the driver of the motorcycle has a duty of care.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found it late to stop the said vehicle according to the vehicle stop signal at the front section of the front section by negligence without driving the vehicle at the front section while it is difficult for the Defendant to drive the vehicle at a normal time due to negligence while under the influence of alcohol. However, the Defendant did not stop the vehicle, but did not stop the vehicle, and received the part behind the said vehicle by the front part of the Ortour that the Defendant drives.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from an injury to the victim due to the foregoing occupational negligence during a period of two weeks, resulting in an injury to the climatic base and the climatic salt. At the same time, the Defendant followed and exchanged the victim.

arrow