The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The costs of litigation in the original instance and the trial shall be borne by the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not violate the signal.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant violated a stop signal as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below, and directly driven a Crais car and left-hand turn pursuant to the new subparagraph, and can be recognized that the defendant suffered injury, such as coo-in and coo-in, which require approximately three weeks of medical treatment, by shocking the victim's e-coo-in car under the new subparagraph. Thus, the defendant's argument is without merit.

B. In full view of all the sentencing conditions in the instant case records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition by the application of Articles 191(1), 190(1), and the main sentence of Article 186(1) of the same Act