logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.08.24 2015나22229
소유권일부이전등기말소등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, except for the case’s first instance judgment’s third to fourth to fourth, the third to fourth of the judgment of the first instance is as follows. Thus, this is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In full view of the facts that there is no dispute between the parties concerned, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 6, testimony by witnesses of the first instance court, and the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of each order to submit financial transaction information to the Central Agricultural Cooperative of the first instance court on March 20, 2012, the defendant transferred KRW 100 million to the account under the name of the plaintiff on March 20, 2012. The plaintiff visited Ulsan-gu Central Agricultural Cooperative Association with the defendant on the same day and opened four fixed deposits under the name of the plaintiff's resident registration certificate and seal imprint (the plaintiff also visited the above Central Agricultural Cooperative with the defendant) and KRW 10,000 won on July 12, 2012, KRW 105,000 to the above Central Agricultural Cooperative, KRW 2,000,000,000 to the above account under the name of the defendant 2,000 won, KRW 310,000,00 won to the above account.

arrow