logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2016.06.09 2016고단202
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant employs 130 full-time workers under the trade name of F in E located in Gyeongnam-si, Gyeongnam-si, and operates a manufacturing business (ship processing).

The Defendant, from Jun. 1, 2015 to Oct. 5, 2015, worked as a site warden at the above workplace, and on Oct. 5, 2015, paid 50,749,50 won, including 11 workers’ wage of Sep. 9, 2015, wage of 5,800, and wage of 177,000 on Oct. 5, 2015, within 14 days from each retirement date without agreement on the extension of payment date between the parties.

Judgment

and Conclusion

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of an intention: Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act;

(c) A statement of complaint and withdrawal of petition filed by G, a representative of each delegated employee (Written Submission on April 11, 2016).

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow