1. From January 13, 2015 to February 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) against the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff, KRW 125,307,418 and KRW 120,000 among them, the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff.

1. Each fact in the separate sheet concerning the determination of the claims of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor shall be acknowledged either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in the separate sheet Nos. 1-1, 2 through 7, 8-1, and 8-2.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Intervenor’s Intervenor the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 125,307,418 as well as KRW 120,00,000 as the balance of the loan principal from January 13, 2015 to February 4, 2015, the agreed interest rate of KRW 17% per annum, and delay damages calculated at 20% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the date of full payment.

2. The Plaintiff’s judgment on the Plaintiff’s claim shall be asserted as indicated in the attached Forms 1 and 2 and filed against the Defendant.

However, comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in the statements in Byung 5, 6, 7, 8-1, and 8-2, the Plaintiff lost its right by giving notice of transfer to B, the debtor, around June 29, 2015, after transferring to the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor the claim as stated in the attached form of claim against the Defendant.

(A) The Plaintiff filed an application for withdrawal from a lawsuit on September 14, 2015, but the Plaintiff did not have obtained the Defendant’s consent as prescribed by Articles 82(3) and 80 of the Civil Procedure Act, and thus, is not effective). 3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim by the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor is accepted for the reasons, and the Plaintiff’s claim