The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

The statements of the victim in the summary of the grounds for appeal are somewhat different in detail, but the part that the defendant injured the victim's breast part by hand and the part that the defendant injured the victim's finger hand by force on the part that he injured the victim's finger hand, etc., are consistent and concrete, and the victim has no reason to file a false complaint, the victim's statement that corresponds to each of the facts charged in this case is credibility.

Nevertheless, the court below rejected the credibility of the victim's statement and found the defendant not guilty of each of the facts charged in this case, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

Judgment

피고 사건에 대하여 원심의 판단 원심은 강제 추행의 점에 대하여, ① 피해자는 신고를 받고 최초로 현장에 출동한 경찰관에게 피고인이 피해자의 왼쪽 엄지손가락을 꺾고, 목을 잡는 등 폭행하였다고만 진술하였을 뿐, 강제 추행 피해 사실에 대하여는 아무런 언급을 하지 않았다가 이틀 뒤 경찰 조사에서 비로소 진술하였는데, 이러한 신고 경위는 다소 이례적인 점, ② 피해자는 추 행 당시 상황과 관련하여, 경찰 조사에서 피해자와 E가 함께 피고인의 양쪽 팔짱을 끼고 밖으로 나갈 때 추행을 당했다고

In the prosecutor's investigation, the injured person was committed an indecent act in the event that the injured person was able to enjoy the accused's hummatic dancing.

In relation to the Defendant’s speech at the time of the prosecution, the police investigation stated that the Defendant was her chest while stating that the Defendant was her chest at the time of the prosecution, and that the Defendant was her chest at the time of the prosecution investigation, and that the Defendant was her chest at the time when she was her mother, and that the Defendant was her chest at the time when she was her mother.

In relation to the degree of conduct, the police investigation stated that the defendant was 2 times his chest in the case of the police investigation.

However, the prosecutor's office has made statements.