logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.10.30 2018구단8324
과징금부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 26, 2013, the Plaintiff, as a company manufacturing semiconductors and industrial machinery equipment, contracted part of the supply of and demand for the pipes of TOXIC GAS (hereinafter “instant pipes”) to E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “SA”), and the main contents of the contract are as follows.

1) A contract on January 9, 2014 (hereinafter “instant First Contract”)

(A) Contract products: The price for the supply of the goods: 1,690,600,000 won (value-added tax separate, structure manufacturing 1,417,000,000, and 273,600,000 won) for the supply of the goods: The non-party 1 shall manufacture the contract products in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the product specifications, specifications, design drawings, and other accompanying documents and supply them to the place of delivery by the date of the delivery, and after completing the delivery, the non-party 1 shall undergo the Plaintiff’s final inspection.

F) The Plaintiff may request the non-party 1 company to add, delete, or modify the contents of product specifications, specifications, design drawings, and other accompanying documents until the completion of the delivery, and the non-party 1 company shall comply with the request unless there is any special reason.) The non-party 1 company is liable as an employer for the act of its employee as an employer under the Labor Standards Act, the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and other relevant Acts and subordinate statutes for employees, and the Plaintiff is not liable as an employer or employer for the non-party 1’s employees

H) In connection with the implementation of this Agreement, Nonparty 1 Company shall compensate for all damages incurred by Nonparty 1’s employees to the Plaintiff by destroying or stealing the Plaintiff’s facilities or property. 2) On January 23, 2014, the instant case No. 2.

arrow