1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. On August 1, 2003, the Plaintiff asserted that he entered into a deposit transaction agreement with the Defendant and deposited KRW 10 million from the Plaintiff’s husband B’s account in the deposit account opened pursuant to the above transaction agreement. Since the Defendant’s employee in charge embezzled the above KRW 10 million, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the embezzlement.

2. In full view of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 24 (including paper numbers), it is not sufficient to recognize the fact that the defendant's employee embezzled 10 million won as alleged by the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just and it is so decided as per Disposition because the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.