(영문) 전주지방법원군산지원 2015.11.05 2015가합11306

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원군산지원 2015.11.05 2015가합11306

건물명도 등

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A delivers the real estate recorded in “real estate” as indicated below, and is from the network B.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff leased to the remaining Defendants, other than Defendant A, the real estate indicated in the order “real estate” column, with the money indicated in the “illegal enrichment equivalent to the rent” as the rent. The Plaintiff agreed that the Plaintiff may terminate the lease contract if the said Defendants and B were in arrears for not less than three months, while leasing the real estate listed in the No. 11 No. 11 to Defendant A’s father B (Death on January 12, 2014) as the monthly rent of KRW 67,500.

B. After that, the Plaintiff notified the Defendants, other than Defendant A, and B, to the end of July and 15 months, that the lease contract was terminated on May 26, 2015.

C. The overdue rent that the Defendants did not pay until May 31, 2015 is as indicated in the “studio rent” column in the text.

On the other hand, the defendant A filed a qualified acceptance report with the court 2014-Ma211.

[Reasons for Recognition] No dispute or entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the lease contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendants was lawfully terminated by the Plaintiff’s notice of termination on the grounds of their delinquency in rent, and the Defendant A is obligated to deliver the real estate indicated in the “real estate” column in the order sheet to the Plaintiff, and to pay the money indicated in the “reasonable rent” column within the scope of the inherited property from the network B, and to pay the money indicated in the “reasonable unjust enrichment” column from June 1, 2015 to the delivery date of the real estate from the network B. The remaining Defendants are obligated to deliver the real estate indicated in the “real estate” column in the above table and pay the money indicated in the “annual rent” column from June 1, 2015 to the delivery date of each real estate.

3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is with merit.

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2017.10.25 2017가단129316

-전주지방법원 2020.06.26 2019가단32622

-서울고등법원 2016.10.19 2015나2071762

-인천지방법원부천지원 2015.11.26 2015가단18611

-수원지방법원성남지원 2016.03.10 2015가단27933