All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. In light of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, the circumstance that the defendant took part in the crime of this case, the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant took part in the crime of this case, such as joining the so-called Bosing organization and communicating directly to the victims in China, and that there is a significant degree of involvement in the crime, and that there is a need to punish severe punishment due to the characteristics of the criminal act of this case, and that there is no history of criminal punishment, and that the defendant's family members want to take part in the criminal act of this case, such as the circumstance that the defendant took part in the criminal act of this case, the background that the defendant took part in the criminal act of this case, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, family relation, etc., the court below's punishment imposed on the defendant is too heavy or

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure: Provided, That according to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the "Article 114(1) and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of imprisonment)" shall be amended to "Article 114 and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (as a whole, the choice of imprisonment)" on the six pages of the decision of the court below.