logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.04.27 2016구단295
난민불인정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of disposition;

A. On January 3, 2011, the Plaintiff, a foreigner of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh (hereinafter “the People’s Republic of Bangladesh”)’s nationality, entered the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit (90 days of stay period) and continued to stay in the Republic of Korea even after the expiration of the period of stay, and applied for refugee status on September 23, 2014.

B. On November 6, 2015, the Defendant issued a notification of refugee non-recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that there is no “a well-founded fear that he would be injured,” which is a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees,” which is a requirement of refugee status.

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, but the said application was dismissed on March 23, 2016.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1 and 2, Eul No. 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's husband's assertion demanded money from the plaintiff's house, which is a slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slick, and the police's slicker's sker's

(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

C. Each description of the evidence of Nos. 1 through 7 and the purport of the whole pleadings.

arrow