The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles, the Defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victim by putting the victim’s her son together with his her son.

B. The lower court’s improper sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below by misunderstanding of facts and legal principles, the F's investigative agency to recognize credibility, especially the statement in the court below, and CCTV images, the defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim as stated in the court below's decision.

The defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

B. Sentencing unfair Defendant is a primary offender. However, the nature and circumstances of the instant crime are not that of the crime, but did not receive a letter from the injured party.

In addition, considering the motive, means and result of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, health status, previous convictions, and circumstances after the instant crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

There is no reason to believe that the sentencing of the defendant is unfair.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.