The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant violated the duty of safe driving by neglecting the duty of safe driving by neglecting the duty of full-time operation at the 40 roads of the Green line of the Green line of Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, at around 22:05 around January 26, 2016.

In full view of the traffic accident report (1) (2) of the judicial police assistant, and the black screen image, etc., the accident place is installed with basic concrete and drums in order to prevent the fall of the vehicle or pedestrian at the lower end of the street, and it was difficult to find pedestrians who walk the drum at night at the time. The defendant was trying to turn to the left at 11 hour in the direction of the vehicle under the left left turn by driving a taxi car (class K9) at night, and the victim was going to turn to the left at the crosswalk in violation of the pedestrian signal, and the defendant discovered and operated the vehicle and operated the vehicle even though the victim was sponsed after the drum, and even if the victim was not able to avoid contact with the victim, it can be recognized that the victim and the victim suffered from collision with the victim.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant neglected his duty of care in the front bank.

There is no evidence to prove that the defendant violated the duty of safe driving at the time and place above.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered after the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment is publicly announced in accordance with the main sentence of Article 58(2) of