Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the lessee of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Building 304, and the victim C is the lessor of the above building.

On August 24, 2016, around 14:35, the Defendant: (a) neglected his/her duty of care, such as taking all of them out after using electric discipline in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Building 304; and (b) destroyed the total amount of damage amount of KRW 9,00,000 by neglecting his/her duty of care; and (c) neglecting his/her duty of care; and (d) destroying part of the surrounding equipment and tools, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to D or C;

1. Report on the occurrence of a fire, notification on the results of fire identification, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (report on the results of fire identification and attachment of photographs);

1. Article 170 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime, Article 170 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s assertion regarding the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is asserted to the effect that “The Defendant did not use the electric virtue on the day of the instant case, and thus, the instant fire was not caused by the Defendant’s negligence.”

However, the following facts, which can be acknowledged by each evidence of the judgment, are: (a) after being found above the above penture, the penture was found; (b) after being found above the above penture was found, the penture was found; (c) the penture valve was located above the lower part; and (d) the fire identification of the fire at the Gangnam Fire Station in the case of the fire at the Gangnamnam Fire Station, the defendant was presumed to be attached to the adjacent combustible materials because the electric virtue was dried up and dried up with the electric scalcure. (v) In the field of the fire at the scene of the fire at the time of the Seoul National Police Agency's investigation on the instant fire at the time of Seoul National Police Agency, there was a conclusion that the electric scalculate above the scalculate.