logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.03.23 2017고정2980
청소년보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant with the trade name of "D" located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C and 102 of the first floor.

No person shall sell, lend, distribute, or provide free of charge drugs, etc. harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

Nevertheless, around 00:50 on April 29, 2017, the Defendant sold at KRW 9,000 3 bottles, which are harmful drugs to juveniles, to four juveniles, including E (16) who come to customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Reporting on detection of violations of the Juvenile Protection Act;

1. The investigation report [the person who prepared the report is also not clear, and the mobile phone display screen showing the cell phone e-mail address of the faculty/department e-mail address of the year of his/her life on the same day, and the person who prepared the report was in full in order to verify whether the person is

It is difficult to see it]

Application of Statutes

1. Article 59 of the relevant Act and Articles 59 subparagraph 6 and 28 (1) of the Juvenile Protection Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. According to Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, considering the fact that only the screen screen of the mobile phone display case in which the authority of the person preparing the reasons for sentencing of the sentencing of the costs of lawsuit is unclear, and that part of the juveniles did not confirm their identification card, and that a strong complaint is raised against the juvenile who was crackdownd even after the discovery, avoided investigation, and sought measures to identify the reporter, the sentence as above is imposed.

arrow