logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2021.02.19 2020고단1345
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12,000,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] The Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violating Road Traffic Act at the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court on August 27, 2009.

[Criminal facts] On May 21, 2020, the Defendant driven FIsta vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.041% during blood in approximately 200 meters from the vicinity of the store in Pyeongtaek-si B to the front of the E Park in Pyeongtaek-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the circumstances of driving at home, a report on the circumstances of the driver at home, and an investigation report (a report on the situations of the driver at home);

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of inquiries, such as criminal history, replys to inquiries, investigation reports (the same kind of force);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act include the following circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive for the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and all sentencing factors indicated in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be comprehensively considered, and the sentence shall be determined as ordered.

D. Unfavorable circumstances: Reoffending after a considerable period of time has elapsed from the time of the previous criminal record of the same kind of the blood, the alcohol concentration level at the time of detection is somewhat above the control standards, the driving distance is not long, there is no circumstance that the risk of the driving is realized due to the case discovered for the mere control of drinking, and the recidivism is after a considerable period of time has elapsed since the previous criminal record of the same kind of the blood.

arrow