logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.24 2015고단2105
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 2105"

1. On November 3, 2013, the defrauded: (a) around November 3, 2013, the Defendant demanded F, an employee, to provide services of beer, beer, and female employees, by pretending that he/she would pay the price at the “E” point of the victim D’s operation located in the wife population C, Young-si; and (b) demanding F, an employee, to provide services.

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if the cash in hand was small, and there was no other possible credit card.

The Defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to the amount of the total market value of KRW 675,00,00 from the injured party, because the Defendant did not pay the amount despite being provided with alcoholic beverages equivalent to the total market value of KRW 675,00,00 and services of employees

2. On December 21, 2013, the defrauded: (a) around 00:30 on December 21, 201, 2013, the Defendant demanded the victim to provide alcoholic beverages and female employees’ services by pretending that he/she would pay the amount from the “H” entertainment week in the wife population C.

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if the cash in hand was small, and there was no other possible credit card.

The defendant did not pay the price of alcoholic beverages equivalent to 330,000 won in total, and the service of employees of Ansan and girls, and acquired property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

3. On January 25, 2014, the defrauded issued an order for alcoholic beverages to L, under the premise that the Defendant would have paid the payment under the “Knart” operated by the victim J, the wife population I, as the case may be, on January 25, 2014.

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if alcoholic beverages, etc. are received from the injured party because there was no cash, and there was no other possible credit card.

The defendant belongs to this.

arrow