Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner of the D Building in Incheon City. On September 23, 2013, the victim E is the person who, from the Defendant on September 23, 2013, leases the first floor and underground floors of the said building to KRW 20,000,000, the rent of KRW 1,900,000, and operates the “F” sales store of bedclothess.

1. On April 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was unable to receive two months from the injured party in F around April 10, 2015, on the ground that he/she was unable to receive two months from the injured party; (b) whether the Defendant was the Natheme fraud;

Along with the Majority’s view that false horses would be feass, feass, who head of feass, who head of feass, and who head of fass, expressed a desire to fass, and obstructed the victim’s operation of bedclothes sales store by force by avoiding the disturbance of about 10 minutes, making the customers who had been in the place go against it.

2. On May 4, 2015, around May 13:0, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s service of bedclothes store by force on the following grounds: (a) on the following grounds: (b) around May 4, 2015, the Defendant: (c) at the above F, the Defendant: (a) had a large amount of brush to “to attach a bbbbbbbbbbing article; (b) failed to bring the Defendant into F; and (c) prevented the Defendant from carrying the Defendant into F; (d) reported to the police; and (d) obstructed the victim’s service of bedclothes store by force by preventing the victimized person from being supplied with the said G from being supplied with the bed detention; and (e) obstructed the victim’s service of bedclothes store by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each statement made by the witness E in the third public trial records and by the witness G in the fourth public trial records;

1. Some statements made to the defendant in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the defendant (including the E statement);

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of each police officer against the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Investigation report (as to the case of a victim’s statement without the victim’s name) and investigation report (to hear statements from a witness G phone), (the defendant and the defense counsel asserts that there was no fact that the defendant did not interfere with each business in their judgment

However, in full view of the circumstances at the time of the consistent statement between the victim and G, the defendant and the victim's relationship, etc., the defendant's respective duties are interfered with.