beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the court shall dismiss “ June 30, 2013.” of Part 3 of the first instance judgment as “ June 20, 2013.” and (b) the reasoning of the first instance judgment (including relevant Acts and subordinate statutes) is the same as that of the second instance judgment; and (c) the same shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The Plaintiff asserts that the Hymera size on the instant proposal is HDCmer, and that the “Effure Effure Effure Effure 1920 x 1080 x 1080 (HxV)” as stated in the said proposal request (hereinafter “the part on which the effective hydrogen number” was stated) was erroneous.
In accordance with the evidence Nos. 4 and 9, the proposal of this case is indicated as "Ful HD shooting system construction, 2/3 or more 3CCD 2.20 or more pixel, Full HD HD 1920 x100 x100" in relation to the proposal of this case. On the other hand, with regard to the Grand River, the proposal of this case is indicated as "Gul Ha, HD Ha, 2/3 or less 3CCD HD 4 Luxembourg, PTZ 2/3 or less, 3CCD HD Ba" and 6 members of J et al. were found to have failed to make up for the completion of the disciplinary procedure of this case and failed to make up for the completion of the amendment of this case by adding up to the 2/3 of the members of the 2/3 of the Han River Party."
“The facts presented to this purport are recognized.”
However, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 5-1, Eul evidence 10-2, Eul evidence 4-2, and Eul evidence 4-2, the part to be entered in the effective hydrogen of this case is specified in the second sentence among the detailed contents of the Dae River Kamerra, and the plaintiff sent the written request for proposal that was confirmed on October 22, 2012 to Eul and received a written estimate, and K K is above.