A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

The defendant shall obtain money from B who is an applicant for compensation 10,000,000 won, and C who is an applicant for compensation.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a lending company under the trade name of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E and 3rd floor F.G.

On June 2016, the Defendant, at the above G office, made an investment in the “repaid loan” and the “repaid loan” that receives 10% of the loan from the 1 finance right in lieu of the loan of the persons who received a high interest rate loan, and the “repaid loan that receives 10% of the loan from the 1 finance right to receive a low interest rate,” and the “repaid loan that receives 10% of the loan from the I organization by giving business registration to the persons who received a high interest rate loan, and giving the credit rating to the persons who received a high interest rate, and allowing the loan from the I organization to receive the loan at the 10% of the fee. The Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the investment in the G office made an investment in the “repaid loan” and the “prepaid loan” business, and made a payment of interest at

However, the obligor who wishes to obtain the above 'transferable loan' or 'transferable loan' is a person who has obtained a loan from 2-3 financial rights at a high interest rate because it was difficult for the obligor to obtain a loan from 1 financial rights, and even if the Defendant failed to obtain any security from 'transferable loan' or 'transferable loan' or 'transferable loan', even if the obligor has succeeded to 'transferable loan' or 'transferable loan', the interest that the obligor should pay every month to the investors ( even if 5% interest rates are agreed to be agreed upon and paid for investment, if the interest is paid for 2-month interest rate, the fee will be advanced and the principal would be incurred). Furthermore, the obligor's 1% allowance to be paid every month to the employees attracting the obligor, and the expenses of the above lending company were insufficient to cause losses, and thus, the Defendant was not able to repay the principal at once due to the lack of the control of the loan, and even so, it was able to prevent the use of interest from being paid to the previous investors.

The Defendant is above.