logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.22 2016가합503539
손해배상(국)
Text

1. The Defendant stated the Plaintiffs’ “amount of discount” in the “amount of discount” in the attached Form 2 sheet, respectively, and against each of them.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From February 7, 1974, the convicted victims of the instant case, Plaintiff E and the networkF, the network G, and the network H (hereinafter “the instant victims”) were committed by the investigators of the Central Information Department affiliated with the Defendant without a warrant, and were detained as the charges of violating the public law and violating the National Security Act, such as the violation of the attached Table 4, and the violation of the Act. The following charges were found guilty and the following charges were finalized:

[Judgment subject to original judgment (hereinafter “instant judgment”). The Seoul Criminal Court Decision 74 Gohap160, 175, 181, and 196 (Consolidation) (hereinafter “instant judgment subject to original judgment”). The defendant guilty in the entirety of the charges charged by the prosecutor, 75Do2791 decided April 8, 1975, 100, 190, 74 Gohap160, 175 (merged), 181 (merged), 196 Seoul Criminal Court, 74No112, 1974, 75Do2791 decided April 8, 1975, 10, 10 years of imprisonment, 10 years of qualification suspension, 10 years of imprisonment, 10 years of dismissal, 3 years of imprisonment with prison labor, 7 years of suspension of qualifications, 7 years of suspension of qualifications, 14 years of suspension of qualifications, and 3 years of dismissal dismissal of the appeal dismissed by the prosecutor.

B. The victims of the instant case were released from custody on the grounds of a suspended sentence, the termination of the term of imprisonment, or parole at the end of the following detention, and were detained for the following period of detention.

The details of detention of the victims of this case are as follows:

The number of days of detention held by the Defendant 1 Plaintiff E at the expiration of the period of detention held on the date of February 7, 1974, around February 3, 1984, around February 7, 1974, around February 25, 1991; around February 6, 1991; around February 6, 228, 191; around February 7, 1974; around May 21, 1980; around February 7, 1974; around 4, 296, around February 7, 1974;

C. Of the victims of this case, the security measures against part of the victims of this case, Plaintiff E, the network F, and the network G are indicated in the following table.

arrow