The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.

2. It is recognized that the defendant's mistake is divided, and that the defendant does not have a criminal record exceeding the fine, etc.

However, considering the fact that the nature of the crime of this case is not good, damage recovery or agreement has not been reached up to the trial of the case even though the amount of damage is reasonable, the balance of sentencing with the same crime, the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and other conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.