The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant include: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime due to the lack of economic circumstances at the time; (b) the amount of individual damages suffered by certain victims due to the instant crime is difficult to deem that the Defendant committed the instant crime is excessive; and (c) the Defendant divided his mistake.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime repeatedly during the period of repeated crime despite having been punished by imprisonment with prison labor due to the same crime, and on around 2009, even though he/she was punished by the crime of larceny, the Defendant committed the instant crime repeatedly during the period of repeated crime. The instant crime was committed repeatedly by the Defendant with the cash and precious metal owned by the victims from about 1 month up to 14 persons through a short period of up to 14 persons, and the nature of the relevant crime is not good, the victims’ losses have not been recovered recently, and other various sentencing conditions such as the Defendant’s age, environment, personality and conduct, etc., it is difficult to see that the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable, and the Defendant’s allegation is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.