The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. On November 4, 2016, around 17:03, the Defendant committed assault, such as, under the influence of alcohol, around 1215, the victim D (70 years of age) at the office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and 12, that she met with the victim D (70 years of age), and that she was in a meeting with the Defendant and the victims of the fluened fire who were fluor, and that she was fluored to turn on the job. As such, the Defendant assaulted the victim, who was influened with the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the

2. Determination

A. The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was drinking by the victim into a small room inside the above 1215 office.

E, etc., and the defendant continued to take a bath without the defendant's request to change outside of the office, and the defendant, after the victim's request, put the victim in the front section of the body and let the victim not take the corridor out of the office, and did not assault the victim like the facts charged.

B. The evidence that the defendant believed to correspond to the facts charged in the part that the defendant abusedd the victim by cutting the victim's body by drinking the victim's arm's body in a fry, there are statements in the investigation agency of F as the victim and witness, and in this court.

In addition, each of the above statements is not consistent, and the victim's and F's legal statements are contradictory to each other (F stated to the effect that "the victim was using rhythm in the office room in the future, and then the defendant went out of the office to take the victim's chest by drinking the victim's chest." On the other hand, the victim stated to the effect that "the defendant was pushed in the office to the extent that he was pushed out with the victim, and the victim committed violence outside the office." On the other hand, other witness E and G correspond to the above argument of the defendant in this court.