The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around June 25, 2012, the summary of the facts charged, the Defendant acquired 20,000 won in cash from the victim, by falsely stating that “A house construction work site for the victim with the wife of the Defendant located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and shall be repaid within 10,000 won if the victim borrowed KRW 20,000,000,000 to the victim.”

2. Determination is a crime falling under Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, and where a crime is committed between lineal blood relatives, spouse, relatives living together, family members living together, or relatives other than their spouse pursuant to Articles 354 and 328(2) of the same Act, a public prosecution may be instituted only upon the victim’s complaint. On May 9, 2014, the victim C stated to the effect that the victim C does not want the revocation of the complaint and the punishment of the victim. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.