The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. On May 2019, the summary of the facts charged of the instant case, the Defendant, while making a telephone conversation with a police officer on behalf of the Defendant, provided that “The Defendant would be exempted from transferring the purchase amount to the e-mail address to the e-mail that would deposit the investment amount with the account, if the account number is notified, deposit the money with the e-mail, and then inform the B of the purchase of the bitco.” In response to the proposal, the Defendant notified the account number (C) of the company bank in the name of the Defendant.

As above, on April 26, 2019, at around 12:04, when sending the number of account numbers under the name of the defendant, the scamcing employee misrepresented the victim D by phoneing to the investigation agency, and falsely called, “the fraud account was opened in his own name. It would solve the problem when establishing and implementing a sign informing us of the bank account number and the authorized certificate password.” The employee transferred KRW 35 million in connection with the Internet banking in the victim’s name without authority by accessing the victim’s Internet banking without authority by using the victim’s information so discovered.

In response to the proposal that the Defendant would give money from the employees of Bosing singing who misrepresented a financial institution, the Defendant was aware that the head of the Tong and scam card were used for the crime of Bosing and was punished for the crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. The Defendant merely knew that the Defendant would receive money equivalent to 3% of the amount delivered to the scam in return for the transfer of money to the scam designated by others after receiving money from the scam, thereby helping to commit the scam crime.