logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2017.06.02 2017허2260
등록무효(특)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Registration No. 1)/ Date of application/registration date: F3) in the name of the invention in C/D/E 2: Defendant 4: The inventor: (a) in the name of the inventor in the name of the Plaintiff, G, and H 2; (b) in the name of the applicant in the form of the MPGA, where a large number of FPGA components are stored; (c) in the form of the DUT testing program; (d) in the form of the FPGA component signal, in the form of the FPGA component information stored in the above MPG unit; and (d) in the form of the semiconductor device or the semiconductor description of the semiconductor equipment in accordance with the testing order signal entered from the above MPG unit; and (e) in the form of the FGPA unit of the FPGA unit of the FGA unit of the above MPG unit of the FPG unit of the FG unit of the FG unit of the FG unit of the 2/6.

B. On December 21, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a petition for registration invalidation trial on the instant patent invention with the Intellectual Property Tribunal against the Defendant Company. “The instant patent invention is an employee invention, and the Plaintiff, an inventor, notified the Defendant Company of the completion of the instant patent invention. The Defendant Company filed a patent application for the instant patent invention without succeeding the Plaintiff’s right. Therefore, the instant patent invention violates Article 33(1) of the Patent Act because it is not filed by the inventor or his successor, and thus, it is in violation of Article 133(1)2 of the Patent Act, and thus, should be invalidated under Article 133(1)2 of the Patent Act.” (2) The Intellectual Property Tribunal deliberated on the instant patent invention with the Intellectual Property Tribunal’s trial on November 2, 2016, and filed a petition for registration invalidation trial on the instant patent invention. However, there was no separate provision on succession to the right to obtain the patent from the Defendant Company.

arrow