logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.09.18 2013고정1441
업무방해
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Judgment on the primary facts charged

A. The summary of the primary facts charged is the person who is working as the chief of the labor force branch of the E-stock company located in Busan, Daegu D, from the beginning of January 2001.

Although the Defendant did not interfere with legitimate election affairs, such as offering money or entertainment to drivers who are the voters related to the election of the head of the Nowon-gu, the Defendant would interfere with the election affairs of the head of the union or the head of the company by providing money or goods by deceptive means by providing G with the election affairs of the head of the union or the head of the company, under the pretext of requesting the support of the Defendant in connection with the above election, on July 17, 2013, for the election of the head of the Nowon-gu, which was enforced on July 16, 2013 and on July 17, 2013, for the purpose of winning the election of the head of the union or the head of the company, which was parked in the above company parking lot.

B. In the crime of interference with business under Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, the term “defensive scheme” means causing mistake, mistake, and land to the other party in order to achieve the purpose of the offender’s act, thereby using the mistake, mistake, and site.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2007Do7724 Decided March 13, 2008, etc.). The following legal principles are to punish the act of delivering money or goods in relation to the election of the chief of the labor union of this case, which is not subject to the Public Official Election Act, as the crime of interference with business under the Criminal Act, (i) the statute of limitations on the crime of interference with business is 6 months, while the statute of limitations on the crime of interference with business is 7 years, the statute of limitations on the crime of interference with business should be more strictly punished in the election of the public office.

arrow