1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows: (a) the reasoning for the first instance judgment (from 2, 12, to 3, 4) is as stated in paragraph 1 of the reasoning of the first instance judgment (from 2, 12, 4, 5). Therefore, this part of the reasoning is cited in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or added parts] On 3rd 2th 2th 2th 2th 1 of the judgment of the first instance court, “The registration of ownership transfer has been completed”, and the following is added: “(3,369m2 and G were 3,475m2 in each land indicated in the item column after the division and merger, which was purchased on June 4, 2003 at Dongducheon-cheon-si, which was purchased on June 4, 2003.”

No 4 of the three and four pages of the decision of the court of first instance are as follows.

In the case of the acquisition of the details of the transfer of the object by consultation, on October 18, 1998, the registration of transfer of ownership based on donation has been completed on October 1, 1980 to G on April 14, 1995, 4 Dong-gu, Dong-si, Dong-si, AA-si 238 square meters (hereinafter “the land of this case 4”) after the division before the compensation was divided, 10,646,50 m2, Dong-do, AJ-si, 131 m2,000,000 m2,000 AJ-si, 131 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 as follows:

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap 1 through 4, and 7 (including additional numbers, if any) , and the fact inquiry result of the court of the first instance with respect to the Korea Land Corporation, the Korea Rail Network Authority, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The plaintiffs' assertion and judgment

A. The summary of the plaintiffs' assertion is as follows: (a) each of the lands of this case is to be closed in G on the ground of donation.