The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant was assaulted by E around June 4, 2012, and the content of the Defendant’s complaint is consistent with objective facts. Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case is erroneous in matters of mistake of facts.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below, i.e., the evidence legitimately adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, i.e., e., from the investigation agency to the court of the court below, i.e., e., farcing on the floor of the Defendant’s farcing farcing farcing, which was not the Defendant’s speech. Then, I was in the middle farcing of the Defendant’s farcing and farcing, and the lower court did not have any physical contact with the Defendant. ii) i.e., i., e., farcing farcing farcing farcing farcing farcing farcing farcing farc farc farc farc farc farc f.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit and Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not reasonable.