The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

At the time of committing the instant crime, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and had no or weak ability to discern things or make decisions.

The court below's sentence of unfair sentencing (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

According to the records on the assertion of mental disorder, even though the defendant was in a state of drinking at the time of the above crime, in light of various circumstances, such as the course and process of the crime, means and method, and the defendant's speech and behavior before and after the crime, the defendant did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions due to drinking.

Since it seems that the defendant was in a state or weak condition, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

In full view of the circumstances that are disadvantageous to the defendant, including the fact that there are many criminal records of the defendant, the fact that the defendant did not agree with the victims and did not recover damage until this court, and other factors of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the background of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the age of the defendant, and the character and conduct environment, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion on this part is without merit.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no ground for appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition.