Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won, and by a fine of 3,00,000 won, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B, while managing the “C” private house, Defendant A’s “C” divided profits into half, but it is not a business as expected, Defendant A was informed of the fact that the verbal abuse was recorded in a smartphone in the course of telephone communications. However, Defendant A became aware of the fact that the verbal abuse was made in the course of telephone communications.

1. Defendant B

A. On September 28, 2013, around 18:50 on September 28, 2013, the Defendant, at the farms of E (ma, 57 years of age) other than the instant case and E (E) located in Jeju Island, destroyed the cell phone in which the Defendant’s recording of the Defendant A was made by cutting off the cell phone in order to cut off the cell phone in which the Defendant, the victim, was recorded, and assaulted six times on the breast part of head.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury that requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment, such as a variety of duplics, including two lups at lups, to Defendant A, who is the victim.

B. The Defendant: (a)

At the temporary location of the paragraph, Defendant A’s cell phone “bera” was rapidly deducted from the market value of KRW 1.3 million of the smartphone, which is the victim, and then damaged the victim’s property by getting off the cell phone market value of KRW 1.3 million.

2. Defendant A’s former Defendant

At the same time, Defendant B, the victim, was assaulted at the victim’s location under this subsection, and “ wherever the flag, such as the flaged flag, whether the flag, the fraud, whether the flag, the fraud, and whether the flag, the flag, was potableed by the flag,” and when the flag was flaged with the flag by hand, the left part was flaged one time.

In this respect, Defendant B, who is the victim, suffered bodily injury that requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the left side of the joint check.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against A, B, or F;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant B: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of injury).